| News That Matte...'s profileNews That MattersPhotosBlogLists | Help |
|
|
October 31 2009 H1N1 Flu: Situation Update (Oct 30th 2009)NTM Staff Note:2008 - 2009 common flu deaths (last year) were approximately 24,000 in 115 cities. That reporting period just ended.http://maker.geocommons.com/maps/5062# http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/update.htm2009 H1N1 Flu: Situation UpdateOctober 30, 2009, 5:30 PM ET Key Flu IndicatorsOctober 30, 2009, 1:30 PM Each week CDC analyzes information about influenza disease activity in the United States and publishes findings of key flu indicators in a report called FluView. During the week of October 18-24, 2009, a review of the key indictors found that influenza activity continued to increase in the United States from the previous week. Below is a summary of the most recent key indicators:
Possible deaths from H1N1 vaccine reported in SwedenPossible deaths from H1N1 vaccine reported in Sweden
Stephanie Dearing There are reports from Sweden of possible deaths linked to the H1N1 vaccine; unconfirmed and unwelcome news which will surely complicate the very busy flu season that has descended on most of the northern hemisphere. While confirmation has yet to be made by health authorities in Sweden, Associated Content is reporting that four people have died after receiving the H1N1 vaccine. Three of those are alleged to have been seniors with serious underlying health conditions. Very little is known about the fourth. The Local has reported that the outbreak of H1N1 flu in Sweden has picked up speed in the past few weeks. About 1 million Swedes have been vaccinated for H1N1. Stockholm News (English) reports that the deaths are being investigated, saying
Parent Alert: Another Child Given Swine Flu Vaccine Without ConsentAnother Child Given Swine Flu Vaccine Without Consent
Health authorities flagrantly disregarding refusal of consent in pursuit of mass vaccination mandate
Paul Joseph Watson A boy in Ohio has received the swine flu vaccine despite the fact that his mother clearly refused consent for her child to be inoculated, in another example of how health authorities are blatantly disregarding the wishes of parents in the pursuit of a mass vaccination mandate. “Kim Lutheran works as a nurse and says her son, Matthew, has had bad reactions to medicine. So, she says she signed for “no consent” on a vaccination form and then circled her intentions with a black marker to make things clear to the boy’s public school in the Toledo suburb of Oregon,” reports the Associated Press. Despite her clear refusal to give consent, the boy was given the H1N1 shot on Monday. Lutheran is now demanding that the local health department be held accountable. The mother had followed the correct procedure in filling in the form because parents were still required to return it even if they were notifying the school of their refusal to give consent. The fact that she so clearly indicated that her son was not to receive the vaccine suggests that health authorities flagrantly ignored her request and inoculated the boy anyway. This is not the first time that a child has received the swine flu shot against their wishes of their parents and it’s unlikely to be the last. (ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW) A 7-year-old boy in Montgomery County was given the nasal spray version of the H1N1 vaccine last week despite his father’s objections that his son should be exempted because of underlying health problems. Matthew Angel called the nurses’ station at Camargo Elementary School to ask why his son Jacob Wages was given the vaccine. They told him they had mistaken the boy with another child. An investigation is currently underway to discover exactly what happened. “A little cold can lead to a big thing for him, if he runs a temperature it’s not a hundred point one, it’s a hundred and five,” said Angel, who fears his son’s health is now at risk. Angel has every right to worry – the nasal spray version of the H1N1 vaccine contains live swine flu virus and doctors and hospitals are expressing concern that the FluMist vaccine could endanger people, with children the most vulnerable. With no less than 60 per cent of the U.S. population immunodeficient in one way or another, the nasal spray could actually make the swine flu pandemic worse, health experts have warned. A number of hospitals across the country have refused to administer the spray form of the vaccine because of these concerns. Watch a clip below.
Prison Planet.tv Members Can Watch Fall Of The Republic Right Now Online - Don't Miss Out! Get Your Subscription Today! England Chief Medical Officer Calls H1N1 Vaccine Resistors “Extremists”England Chief Medical Officer Calls H1N1 Vaccine Resistors “Extremists”
Comments ignorant of public backlash against swine flu shot Steve Watson The Chief Medical Officer in England has described those who are speaking out against the mass swine flu vaccination campaign as “extremists”. The comment made by Sir Liam Donaldson, the government’s senior advisor on health matters, was highlighted in a Times of London article today. “We have had a lot of unfair public criticism and attacks in an attempt to scare people about a vaccine that’s potentially life-saving,” Donaldson said in reference to anti-vaccination posters depicting the H1N1 shot as a “weapon of mass destruction”. “We have seen it before with vaccines like MMR [the combined jab for measles, mumps and rubella], and now extremists are doing the same thing again.” he added. Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish Health Secretary added: “Vaccination is our best defence against this virus and I urge everyone who is in the priority groups to accept the vaccine when invited to do so.” Donaldson’s remarks are ill thought out considering the fact that senior neurologists have voiced concerns over the adjuvants in the H1N1 flu vaccine and the fact that it has been rushed through safety procedures, with manufacturers provided with blanket immunity from potential lawsuits. In addition, multiple opinion polls have revealed that half of GPs in Britain have severe reservations and doubts over the safety of the shot. A much larger Nursing Times magazine poll in August also found that 30% of all frontline nurses said they would refuse to be immunized, with another 33% saying they were unsure over the vaccine. 50% of pregnant women in the UK have also said they will refuse the vaccine. No matter, apparently the government believes you are an “extremist” if you don’t shut up and take it. Donaldson’s comment is also especially relevant in the wake of news that police in Britain have defined political activism as “domestic extremism” and are treating people who attend demonstrations as criminals, cataloguing them on multiple national databases. Pirates Demand $7M, Cast Themselves as Environmental Protectorshttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,570711,00.html?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a4:g4:r1:c0.000000:b0:z5 Pirates Demand $7M, Cast Themselves as Environmental Protectors MOGADISHU, Somalia — Somali pirates who are demanding $7 million in ransom for a British sailing couple say boats from other countries are plundering Somalia's fish-rich waters, a pirate spokesman said Saturday. SLIDESHOW: British Couple Kidnapped by Pirates Ahmed Gadaf, who says he's a spokesman for the pirates, said the group holding the couple hostage off Somalia's coast was made up of "voluntary guards" — not pirates. "The Western forces continue to loot our natural resources. They continue to harass local fishermen and destroy their fishing nets, so we want them to taste the consequence," Gadaf said by satellite phone from the coastal town of Haradhere. The British couple, Paul and Rachel Chandler, are safe and will not be harmed, Gadaf said. They will be released once the ransom is paid, he said. The Chandlers were headed to Tanzania in their boat, the Lynn Rival, when a distress signal was sent Oct. 23. The British navy found their empty yacht on Thursday, and both have been in sporadic contact with the British media since. Illegal fishing off the coast of Somalia stirs strong passions in the country. The prime minister of Somalia's transitional government, Omar Abdirashid Ali Sharmarke "Many of these pirates were once profitable fisherman and would be so again given the chance," he said at the London-based Chatham House think tank. "I shall not name names, but suffice to say many countries are fishing illegally in Somali waters," he said. "We estimate that the value of the fish being taken from our waters is perhaps hundreds of millions of dollars. "It is wholly unacceptable for these countries, many of whom claim they want to help Somalia, to turn a blind eye to this theft. Particularly when that theft robs thousands of Somali people of a way out of poverty and a way out of piracy," Sharmarke said. Rachel Chandler told her brother in a telephone call broadcast by ITV News on Friday that the pirates were "hospitable people," a message that Sharmarke underscored in his London remarks. British officials held a meeting on the hostage situation Friday in the government's crisis briefing room. The Foreign Office said a team from across several government departments was involved. Both the Foreign Office and Ministry of Defense declined to comment on whether any potential rescue was under consideration. Pirate attacks have increased the last several weeks after the recent end of the monsoon season. An international armada is patrolling the region to try to stop the attacks. Chicago terror case's troubling implicationsChicago terror case's troubling implications
A new concern: American name, American visa, but European targets
WASHINGTON - It is a worrisome first: an American accused of going to Europe to plot a terrorist attack there. That is the most striking aspect of a Chicago case in which a Pakistani-American businessman allegedly planned an attack on a Danish newspaper targeted by Islamic extremists for printing cartoons of the Prophet Mohamed. The businessman, David Coleman Headley, was arrested by the FBI this month after a year-long investigation. The case is the latest example of a U.S. suspect allegedly gaining direct access to high-level extremist leaders. It indicates that Lashkar-e-Taiba, the Pakistani group accused in last year's Mumbai attacks, still shares Al Qaeda's determination to strike the West. And with officials saying additional arrests are possible, the case also reiterates a surprising reality: One of the world's most likely targets of terrorism today is placid Denmark, population 5.5 million. "We never thought it could be persons from the U.S. coming here to commit attacks," said Hans Jorgen Bonnichsen, a former chief of Denmark's police security intelligence service, in a telephone interview. "This shows a new tendency." The evolving threat shows the need for close teamwork with law enforcement in other countries, he said."Until yesterday, the threat was mainly from homegrown groups," Bonnichsen said. "This case shows a very strong connection to Al Qaeda groups in Pakistan. That is really a challenge and we can only handle it by depending on good international cooperation." Denmark has confronted a barrage of propaganda and threats since 2005, when the Jyllands Posten newspaper published caricatures of the Prophet Mohamed -- an act condemned by Muslim groups and defended by advocates of free speech. In a 2007 raid on a bomb factory in a Copenhagen apartment, police arrested two South Asians who later were convicted of training with Al Qaeda in Pakistan for a bomb attack. In February, 2008, police broke up an alleged homegrown plot in which three suspects planned to assassinate the newspaper's cartoonist. Publications reprinted the Mohamed cartoons in solidarity with the victim, triggering an "absolutely berserk" surge of threats, said a Danish intelligence official who requested anonymity. Four months later, a car-bombing at the Danish embassy in Islamabad killed six people and Al Qaeda declared the attack was revenge on Denmark. Danish security forces keep close watch on their surprisingly fierce extremist underworld. But they had not expected the likes of Headley, an American who admits visiting the newspaper's offices in January and July on the pretext of wanting to advertise his immigration consulting company in Chicago, according to an FBI complaint. Headley, 49, filmed video of potential targets during an alleged scouting mission in Copenhagen and Aarhus for what officials say may have been a commando-style raid, like the Mumbai attack. In addition to his passport and profession, Headley was older than most extremists. Police are still trying to determine if he had any Danish accomplices. "This is what Danish intelligence was most scared of," said Morten Skjoldager, author of "The Threat Within," a new book about terrorism in Denmark. "The extremist environment in Denmark is so small that, if you get in touch with someone in that world, it will be noticed by the intelligence services. But so far, it seems he had no connections with Denmark." Headley's travels represent the reverse of a trend feared by U.S. authorities: terrorists forged in Europe's large militant communities taking advantage of limited visa requirements to enter the United States. Radicalization among U.S. Muslims remains rare compared even to small countries like Denmark. With Al Qaeda determined to strike on U.S. soil, Western officials assume that Americans will be used for attacks here. European police generally devote less scrutiny to U.S. visitors than to some of their citizens of immigrant descent returning from South Asia or North Africa. "It's a bit surprising," said Louis Caprioli, an executive at the GEOS security firm in Paris and former French anti-terror chief. "It's the first time we talk about an American leaving for Europe for a terrorist act." Headley was born Daood Gilani in the United States and attended military school in Pakistan, his family homeland. He admits changing his name in 2006 to "raise less suspicion" when traveling, the federal complaint says. It suggests that his business was a cover. "Notwithstanding his apparent lack of financial resources and substantial employment, Headley has engaged in extensive international travel" to destinations including the militant bastion of Waziristan, the complaint says. He admits to training with Lashkar and working with the group for at least three years, authorities say. Created by Pakistani security forces as an arm in the struggle for Indian-occupied Kashmir, Lashkar funnels recruits to Al Qaeda and participates in plots against the West. Lashkar's slick English propaganda appeals to aspiring holy warriors in North America and Britain. Foreigners find it easier to reach Lashkar training camps because they are tolerated -- or supported -- by elements of Pakistan's security forces, according to Western anti-terror officials. Headley developed the Denmark plot with a Lashkar operative in Pakistan and with Ilyas Kashmiri, a notorious militant chief who runs a training camp in Waziristan and has become a close Al Qaeda ally, the complaint charges. As evidence, it cites surveillance and Headley's confession. Headley allegedly met Kashimiri and communicated with him through the Lashkar operative. Calling Kashmiri "his spiritual guide," Headley wrote anguished e-mails after inaccurate news reports that the leader had died in an air strike, the complaint says. Learning that Kashmiri was alive, the complaint says Headley wrote: "Buddy, if this is true, then I will say 100 prayers." FBI agents arrested him Oct. 3 at the airport as he began a trip to Pakistan to meet with Kashimiri, the complaint says. In other recent cases, authorities similarly accused young Americans of going to Pakistan and gaining access to top bosses of Al Qaeda, who enlisted them for U.S. plots. U.S. air strikes, aided by spies on the ground, have made Al Qaeda increasingly wary of Westerners, European officials say. But militant groups remain eager for U.S. recruits, investigators say. Headley's handlers made the most of his value as an undercover operative, at one point communicating with him about switching from Denmark to a plot in India, the complaint says. During the exchanges, Headley allegedly used code substituting business for terrorism and companies for terror groups. "The main thing is the business must go on," he wrote on Sept. 20, according to the complaint. "I don't care [if] I am working for Microsoft or I am working [for] GE or Philips." The true meaning, according to the complaint: Headley did not care which group he worked for as long as he could help carry out attacks. Rotella@latimes.com Democrat leader convicted of fraud in New JerseyDemocrat leader convicted of fraud in New Jersey
![]() Another New Jersey political leader is headed for a prison cell. Photo credit: Politico In yet another case of political misconduct in New Jersey, a federal jury convicted former Bergen County Democratic Organization chairman Joseph Ferriero of conspiracy and mail fraud in connection with a scheme to defraud Bergenfield of the honest services of its borough attorney Dennis Oury, according to a report obtained by the National Association of Chiefs of Police's Fraud & White Collar Crime Committee. Yesterday, it was determined that Ferriero faces a 60-year prison sentence when he is sentenced on February 10, 2010. The conviction also carries a fine of $250,000.00, according to Judge Stanley R. Chesler, who presided over the trial.
The jury found Ferriero guilty of one count of conspiracy and two counts of mail fraud related to his scheme with Oury to create a grants consulting firm, Governmental Grants Consulting (GGC), which they used to solicit a municipal contract with the borough while hiding Oury’s involvement and financial interests in the company. The jury acquitted Ferriero of five other mail fraud counts. Testimony in the trial of Ferriero began on October 1 and the jury started its deliberations on the morning of October 22 and returned its verdicts approximately six hours later. Two days before both Oury and Ferriero were to go on trial together, Oury pleaded guilty to the conspiracy count and to one count of failing to file a federal tax return. Oury subsequently testified in support of the government’s case against Ferriero. “The verdict puts an end to an era of abusive power and politics by Mr. Ferriero,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Weysan Dun. “From this verdict, we learn again that the citizens of New Jersey must play an active role in their government and question their leaders. They must inquire who stands to profit from the deals and decisions off their leaders. If the answers to those questions don't add up or are unsatisfactory, then citizens must not be afraid to enlist the help of the FBI.” The charges at trial related to the creation of GGC by Ferriero and Oury and their efforts to conceal their interests while profiting from Bergen County municipalities –- Bergenfield specifically –- where Ferriero was to use his influence as a dominant political party chairman to secure local government contracts. On January 1, 2002, at the Bergenfield municipal government annual reorganization meeting, Oury was appointed to serve as the Borough’s municipal attorney. At the same meeting, despite the fact that GGC was still in the planning stages and had yet to be formally organized as a company, Bergenfield retained GGC to serve as its grants consultant and agreed to pay it a $6,000 retainer fee plus an additional fee calculated as a percentage of any grants or loans received. Neither Oury nor Ferriero, however, disclosed at that time or any time subsequently their ownership interest in GGC. Oury went on to exercise his official power as borough attorney to further a grant-aided real estate purchase between Bergenfield and a private estate –- all as Oury and Ferriero stood to gain personally from GGC and Bergenfield. Simultaneously, Oury billed Bergenfield for his work as Borough Attorney on the real estate acquisition. Trial testimony –- including from Oury on behalf of the government –- revealed that he and Ferriero took steps to conceal their roles in GGC and prevent Oury’s undisclosed conflict of interest from coming to light. For example, despite the fact that Ferriero was the moving force behind GGC and was its largest shareholder, Ferriero drafted a shareholder agreement assigning positions of president and secretary to others with only minimal involvement with GGC. In 2002, GGC applied on Bergenfield’s behalf for $1.4 million in funding from a Bergen County open space trust fund and New Jersey’s Green Acres grant program to acquire a private estate and preserve it as a historic site. Subsequently, Ferriero sent a copy of the grant application with a cover letter on his law firm’s letterhead to the Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, which administers the Green Acres Program. In his letter – while never revealing his connection to GGC or his financial interest in getting grants for Bergenfield – Ferriero stated that it was “extremely important to (him) personally that this application receive favorable review by the Department.” By late 2002, Bergen County awarded Bergenfield $800,000 in grant money for the estate acquisition, and in November 2003 the state Green Acres program awarded Bergenfield a $600,000 grant and loan package (ultimately, Bergenfield did not receive the full $600,000). Consequently, based on the successful grant applications, the Borough of Bergenfield issued a check for $128,625 to GGC, representing its “Consulting Grant Fulfillment Fees.” Oury thereafter received a check in the amount of $25,016.97, and Ferriero a check for $27,538.04, with the rest disbursed to other individuals associated with GGC. All of the checks were signed by Ferriero. Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and he's a staff writer for the New Media Alliance (thenma.org). In addition, he's the former editor for the House Conservatives Fund's weblog. Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty. He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations. He's also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country. Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He's a news writer for TheConservativeVoice.Com and PHXnews.com. He's also a columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com. He's appeared as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, Fox News, etc. To subscribe to Kouri's newsletter write to COPmagazine@aol.com and write "Subscription" on the subject line October 30 Propaganda Commercial For Children "Get The Shot"Sid The Science Kid
HOLLYWOOD, Calif., Oct. 9 /PRNewswire/ -- Everyone's favorite preschool scientist, Sid, star of SID THE SCIENCE KID, is hearing a lot of talk this fall about how to stay healthy, which leads him to ask lots of questions about what can make a person sick and what he can do to keep from getting sick. In the new special episode "Getting a shot: You Can Do It!" from the Emmy®-nominated series, Sid and his friends will learn the basic science behind germs, viruses and vaccines using age-appropriate vocabulary and scientific concepts that have become a hallmark of the series. PBS KIDS will premiere the series on Monday, October 26 (check local listings) with several re-airings over the following weeks. It's vaccination day at Sid's school, and Sid and his friends are a little apprehensive about getting a shot. Thankfully, a very special nurse will be giving the kids their vaccination--Sid's Grandma! Throughout the special episode, Grandma, Teacher Susie, Mom and Dad all do their part to make vaccination day a fun learning experience filled with music, games and lots of laughs. How Hitler Controlled Nazi Prison Camps With FluorideWHEN DID THIS FLUORIDATION MADNESS BEGIN? The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water was found in Germany's Nazi prison camps, which were maintained partly by I.G.Farben. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride's supposed effect on children's teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force them into calm submission. (Ref. book: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" by Joseph Borkin.) FLUORIDE A FLUORIDE is a combination of the chemical element Fluorine with some other substance. Sodium fluoride, a hazardous-waste by-product from the manufacture of aluminum, is a common ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, anesthetics, hypnotics, psychiatric drugs, military nerve gas, and U.S. drinking water. "Advertisements by Alcoa Aluminum recommending that we add sodium fluoride to our drinking water supply, can be found in old periodicals dated BEFORE fluoridation was officially approved by the authorities. Fluoride promoter Oscar Ewing, head of the Federal Security Agency (FSA) senior to the U.S. Public Health Service in 1951, left the employ of Alcoa Aluminum not long before he headed up the U.S. fluoridation campaign in the early 1950's. (Follow the money) Toxic sodium fluoride and its more toxic fluorinated cousins like potassium fluoride have historically been quite expensive to properly and safely dispose of, until around 1950 when some industries with an overabundance of this toxic waste actually convinced the public on the terrifically insane but highly profitable idea of selling it to the public at a 20,000% markup, injecting it into our fresh water supply, and then DRINKING it." [Full Details About Fluoride] http://www.vaccinetruth.org/fluoride.htm
UK: Council bans parents from play areasCouncil bans parents from play areasParents have been banned from supervising their children in public playgrounds, because they have not undergone criminal record checks.Only council-vetted "play rangers" are now allowed to monitor youngsters in two adventure areas in Watford while parents must watch from outside a perimeter fence. The Watford Borough Council policy has been attacked as insulting and a disgrace by furious relatives who say they are being labelled as potential paedophiles. It will further fuel concerns over a growing nanny state amid the deepening row over the Government's new national anti-paedophile database. That will see at least 11 million adults have to be vetted to work with children or vulnerable adults, including parents who give officials lifts to and from social or sports clubs. Councillors in Watford claim they are only following Government guidelines and cannot allow adults to walk around playgrounds "unchecked". But Osfted dismissed the ban while parents branded it "a joke". The rules have been imposed at Harwoods and Harebreaks adventure recreation grounds. Activities on the half acre sites include a skateboard half-pipe, a zip line, rope swings, den building, arts and crafts, plus a wide range of indoor and outdoor sports activities. Play rangers currently patrol both parks – which are specifically for children aged five to 15 – and are fully qualified and have been cleared by the Criminal Records Bureau. Parents already have to 'register' their child on arrival at the free playgrounds so staff have their contact details in the event of an accident. But now only those who have been CRB vetted by the council can enter the sites, which are surrounded by six foot high steel and wooden fences. Mother-of-five Marcella Bergin, 35, has been visiting with her three eldest children, Christy, 15, Seamus, 12, and Chloe, 11, for many years without any problems. She said: "It's like they are branding all parents potential paedophiles which is disgraceful – 99 per cent of people are great parents and certainly not child abusers. "The whole thing is just a joke and I will certainly not be adhering to the new rules which frankly are crazy." Mo Mills, 62, a retired youth worker who has six grandchildren, added: "This is typical of the nanny state and I am furious – the council should hang their head in shame at this political correctness gone mad." Mum-of-eight Jenny Abbasi, 41, said: "I find it insulting that the council are essentially branding everyone paedophiles and telling us we cannot be trusted with our own kids – it's a disgrace." Claude Knights, the founder of children's charity Kidscape, said the council were "using a sledgehammer to crack nuts". "They are encouraging a climate where parents and children are rendered suspicious without any proof of wrong doing or guilt," she said. "Caring parents should not be viewed as a threat and if you are a bona fide parent or carer you are in a better position to look after your children than council staff." A council notice to parents explains that: "Safeguarding the children and young people who use the site is one of our top priorities. "Due to Ofsted regulations we have a responsibility to ensure that every authorised adult who enters our site is properly vetted and given a Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) check by Watford Borough Council." Council Mayor Dorothy Thornhill argued they are merely enforcing government policy at the play areas, in Vicarage Road and Leggatts Way. She said: "Sadly, in today's climate, you can't have adults walking around unchecked in a children's playground and the adventure playground is not a meeting place for adults. "We have reviewed our procedures, so although previously some parents have stayed with their children at the discretion of our play workers, this is not something we can continue to do. "There are other places in the town for parents with small children to go." But a spokeswoman for Ofsted said: "Ofsted would never seek to prevent parents and carers having access to their own children. "We would not insist that each parent must have a member of staff with them all times. "Many settings operate very well with parents and carers present, and indeed this can be an important part of young children settling somewhere new." The Daily Telegraph disclosed on Tuesday how employers will come under pressure to register staff with the Government's anti-paedophile database even if they have little contact with children Sir Roger Singleton, the chairman of the Independent Safeguarding Authority, said the scope of the planned database could increase significantly because companies would fear losing business if they did not have their employees vetted. Last month, he was asked by the Government to look again at the complex definitions of "frequent" and "intensive" contact following concerns that the scheme would lead to state supervision of all relationships between adults and children. TSA may have you spread your cheeks, terrorists latest threatTrouble in the KingdomBy Annie Jacobsen in category The Al-Qaeda Threat
A suicide bomber almost managed to kill a heavily guarded Saudi prince, passing through several security checkpoints with a bomb hidden in his rectum.
'Muslim Mafia' linked to Detroit FBI shootoutHOMELAND INSECURITY
'Muslim Mafia' linked to Detroit FBI shootout Book: CAIR chief gave thousands to cop-killing jihad cell leader Posted: October 29, 2009 10:55 pm Eastern By Art Moore
Internal documents from an undercover investigation by the authors of "Muslim Mafia" show CAIR helped finance the legal appeal of Muslim cop-killer Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin, who is named in the Detroit criminal complaint as the spiritual leader of a radical group that calls for violent action to establish a sovereign Islamic state within the U.S. The federal complaint also states one of the 11 indicted followers of the imam who was killed in an exchange of gunfire with the FBI Wednesday, Luqman Ameen Abdullah, attended a mosque "affiliated with CAIR" in Windsor, Ontario, just across the Canadian border from Detroit. Get "Muslim Mafia," autographed, from WND's Superstore The criminal complaint suggests CAIR literature supporting Al-Amin incited Abdullah to violence. "CAIR and everybody send me all of this stuff. I get sick," he was recorded as saying. "I got some soldiers with me. ... Brothers that I know would, you know, if I say 'Let's go, we going to go and do something.'" Abdullah and his "soldiers" trained with weapons and explosives to carry out a plot to "take down" the U.S. government in violent jihad, according to the complaint. Al-Amin, the complaint adds, has been designated by the "nationwide radical fundamentalist Sunni group" led by Abdullah to be the ruler of the future Islamic state. Formerly a leader of the Black Panther Party known as H. Rap Brown, Al-Amin is serving a life sentence at the Florence, Colo., supermax prison for shooting two police officers in Georgia and murdering one of them. As revealed in a confidential letter obtained by the authors of "Muslim Mafia," P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry, CAIR made an "additional contribution" of $9,000 in April 2007 to Al-Amin's legal appeal.
The letter of thanks addressed by the cop-killer's lawyer-wife to CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad, which indicated CAIR had made previous contributions, passed on "greetings" from the imprisoned imam. Attorney Karima Al-Amin wrote: As-salaamu alaikum: Al-Amin, a black convert to Islam, shot two Atlanta deputies in 2000 who were trying to arrest him for failing to appear before a judge on auto theft charges. One deputy was shot in both legs, the left arm and the chest. The other, Fulton County Deputy Ricky Kinchen, died after Al-Amin pumped him with six bullets. A jury convicted Al-Amin in 2002 and sentenced him to life in prison, but CAIR jumped to his defense, celebrating him as a martyr.
The group participated in an Atlanta news conference protesting the guilty verdict, and Awad visited him in jail. CAIR is listed as a member of the National Support Committee for Imam Jamil, which has a stated goal of raising $1.3 million to pay for a team of lawyers to free Al-Amin. "Whoever shields a Muslim, Allah will shield him in this world and the next," the committee says in a fundraising letter. "Allah will aid a servant so long as the servant aids his brother." 'Complete shock' Abdullah, imam of the Masjid Al-Haqq mosque in Detroit, was one of 12 named in the indictment released Wednesday, which includes charges of conspiracy, dealing in stolen goods and weapons offenses. Eight of Abdullah's followers were in custody Wednesday night and three remained at large. The head of CAIR's Michigan branch, Dawud Walid, told the Detroit Free Press any attempt to link Abdullah to his group is "bogus." He insisted CAIR has no connection with the Windsor mosque or with Abdullah.
"No one in that mosque has ever been a board member, or a staffer, or even a dues-paying member for that matter," Walid asserted. But Walid told the Associated Press he knew Abdullah to be a "respected imam in the Muslim community." "He would open up the mosque to homeless people. He used to run a soup kitchen and feed indigent people," Walid said. "I knew nothing of him that was related to any nefarious or criminal behavior." Abdullah served together with at least two CAIR figures in the governing body of the Muslim Alliance in North America, or MANA, a national network of mosques, Muslim organizations and individuals "committed to work together to address certain urgent needs within the Muslim community." Former CAIR national advisory board member and current fundraiser Siraj Wahhaj is a MANA leader along with Ihsan Bagby, a longtime member of CAIR's board of directors.
In addition to their membership in the governing body, Wahhaj is the "amir," or chief, of MANA's executive committee, and Bagby is the staff general secretary. Al-Amin is one of the founders of MANA, which is made up of radical black converts to Islam, including one of the imams of the 9/11 mosque near the Pentagon. Bagby told the Detroit News the FBI raid and death of Abdullah shocked the African-American Muslim community nationwide. "We want to know what happened," said Bagby. "We had no inkling of any kind of criminal activity. This is a complete shock to all of us." But as "Muslim Mafia" author Sperry reports in his previous book "Infiltration," Bagby once stated his belief that Muslims cannot be faithful to the U.S. "Ultimately we can never be full citizens of this country," Bagby said, "because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country." As WND reported, Wahhaj – who is on record urging a violent overthrow of the "filthy" U.S. government assisted by jihad warriors armed with Uzis – gave a fundraising appeal for CAIR at its 15th annual banquet in Arlington, Va., Saturday night.
'Every Muslim should have a weapon' An affadavit filed with the complaint by FBI agent Gary Leone said Abdullah, also known as Christopher Thomas, called his followers "to an offensive jihad, rather than a defensive jihad." "He regularly preaches anti-government and anti-law-enforcement rhetoric." Abdullah and his followers, Leone says, "have trained regularly in the use of firearms and continue to train in martial arts and sword fighting." The imam preached that "every Muslim should have a weapon and should not be scared to use their weapon when needed." Leone says members and former members of the mosque "have stated they are willing to do anything Abdullah instructs and/or preaches, even including criminal conduct and acts of violence."
The FBI agent says that when Abdullah's mosque was evicted from its previous location in Detroit, a search turned up empty shell casings and large holes in the concrete wall of an indoor "shooting range." A confidential source who admitted he was a follower of Abdullah, says Leone, saw the imam "discipline children inside the mosque by beating them with sticks on their hands, knees and legs, until they were covered with bruises." The source said Abdullah beat one boy so badly with sticks he was unable to walk for several days. "Abdullah and Al-Amin both served Muslim Brotherhood entities whose objective is to wage 'civilization jihad' against America to 'destroy' it," said veteran FBI special agent John Guandolo, who worked counterterrorism cases out of the bureau's Washington field office. "Al-Amin served CAIR," Guandolo added, "and was on the board of ISNA (Islamic Society of North America, CAIR's sister organization) – both leading Muslim Brotherhood entities in America and both unindicted co-conspirators in the largest terrorism financing case in U.S. history," the criminal trial of the Holy Land Foundation, Hamas' fundraising arm in America. Our Out-of-Whack Economy and the Happy Talk PropagandistsOur Out-of-Whack Economy and the Happy Talk PropagandistsBy Dave Lindorff
If you listen to the happy-talk folks at Treasury and the Fed, and on the tube, you'd think things had finally turned a corner. The economy grew at a 3.5% annualized rate in the third quarter ended September 30. “The Economy is Back in Gear” shouted the headline on an article by CNN senior writer Chris Isadore. “The recession ended unofficially in September,” said a reporter on NPR. There was some mention of the fact that earlier in the week there were reports that consumer confidence had fallen, foretelling a sluggish Christmas retail season, and that new home sales slipped an unanticipatedly high 3.6% in September, when analysts had been expecting a rise in sales. Meanwhile, new unemployment claims filed during the third week of October jumped to 531,000, well above the predicted 520,000, indicating that the official unemployment rate is likely to top 10% in the next Department of Labor report due out in early November. As well, fully one-third of the nation's homeowners were now said to be “underwater,” meaning that their outstanding mortgage balances are greater than the current value of their homes. Not surprisingly, foreclosures are continuing to surge. situation? Well, that positive economic growth figure, which comes on the heels of a 6.4% decline in GDP in the first quarter and a .7% decline in the second quarter, is, according to government analysts, actually largely the result of two government stimulus programs—the “cash for clunkers” program that induced people to rush out and buy a new car (usually a much smaller, cheaper and, for the car makers, less profitable one than they had been buying in prior years), and the $8,000 new home tax credit, which led a lot of people to rush out and buy a first home. The thing about those two stimulus programs is that they don't so much expand economic activity as they push it forward. That is to say, a person who takes advantage of the cash-for-clunker program is generally someone who owns a worn-out junker and needs to buy a new vehicle anyhow, so what the government subsidy does really is just push that purchase forward. Once the program ended, sales of cars plummeted (not to mention that the bulk of the payments went to people who purchased foreign cars, so the economic boost was just for dealers in the US, not car makers). The same is true with houses. Very few people would make the decision about whether to buy a home or not based on just $8000, but the availability of an $8000 government subsidy for a limited time would lead people to push forward their plan to purchase a home. What that means is, don't count on this “recovery” to last into next year. The cars that needed to be bought have been bought, and the homes that people wanted to buy have been bought. The car subsidy is gone now, and even extending the home buying subsidy, as the realty industry lobby is pressing Congress to do, isn't going to induce that many more people to buy. Meanwhile it's worth noting an oddity about this “recovery” being trumpeted in government and media. The relationship between the dollar and the stock market has become very strange. If you look back at stories on these two things to 2007, before the financial crisis hit, and earlier, you'll see myriad articles explaining that the dollar and the US stock market tend to move in tandem. This was always explained as being because as the dollar strengthens, foreign investors want to put their money into dollar-denominated assets. Similarly, if the dollar weakened, analysts would write confidently that the stock market would be hurt as investors pulled their money out of US equities to invest in markets denominated in appreciating currencies. Now, the analysts say that as equities strengthen, the dollar will fall, but if equities fall, the dollar will appreciate. The reason for this new inverse relationship should be cause for considerable alarm. Why? In fact, it turns out that the last eight months of a rising equities market has been largely the direct result of a shrinking dollar. This is because so much of the sales and earnings of companies in the S&P 500 and the much narrower Dow Index are earned overseas, denominated in foreign currencies, but accounted for on the books of these US-incorporated firms in dollars, that as the dollar declines in value, corporate sales and earnings appear to be growing. Reportedly, as much as 80 percent of the appreciation in the S&P Index since last March 9 when the market hit bottom can be attributed to the dollar's fall against major world currencies. Financial writers and reporters on TV don't mention this tectonic shift. They just report the new relationship (Stocks up, dollar down, stocks down, dollar up) as though that's they way it's always been. But actually, this is a phenomenon has normally ben characteristic of Third World, so-called “developing” economies. That since the end of 2008 it has become characteristic of the US economy should be cause for concern. So don't be conned by the happy talk salesmen at the Fed and Treasury and in the White House, or by their propagandists in the newsmedia, who are trumpeting the latest GDP growth figure as a sign that the recession is over, apparently in the hopes that people will run out to the mall and start spending (in those remaining stores that don't have their windows taped or covered in plywood). What we've seen was a blip on the chart, engineered by a couple of “going out of business” sales by the car and housing industry. Real unemployment—measured the honest way it used to be 30 years ago, to include those who have given up looking for work or who are working part time involuntarily—is hitting 20% (for those who are bad at math, that's one out of five working-age Americans). Foreclosures are hitting a record. Half of laid-off workers are cashing out their 401(k)s in order to buy food. State and local governments, both major employers, are hitting a wall as tax collections plummet and federal stimulus funds run out. This is not the foundation for a renewal of economic growth; it is the precondition for a renewed or prolonged recession. And if the dollar continues its slide, which is likely given the US's huge budget deficits and trade deficits, as well as the Federal Reserve's inability to raise interest rates (a move that could strengthen the dollar but which would crush the economy), all those things that Americans buy abroad which are no longer made at home, as well as the oil that is imported, will cost that much more, driving consumers further into the hole. And remember, 70% of US GDP is consumer spending, a result of our decimation of our industrial base. Recession ending? Don't bet on it. Panama: Dirty Diamonds, a New Smuggling Headache Coming...Dirty Diamonds in PanamaINTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND SECURITY NETWORK
Poised to become a hub for the Latin American diamond market, Panama may also become a funnel for smuggling illegal diamonds abroad, writes Samuel Logan for ISN Security Watch. Leaders from the global diamond trade met in Panama City on 13 October to persuade President Ricardo Martinelli to establish a tax-free zone for Latin America’s first regional diamond exchange. The lobbyists won over Martinelli, who by 19 October had publicly committed to support legislation in the Panamanian National Assembly designed to give free trade zone status to the Panamanian Diamond Exchange (PDE). Colombia: U.S. Military Deal Allows Access to Seven BasesUS, Colombia ink controversial military base deal
(Press TV) -- The US and Colombia have signed a controversial military pact that would allow Washington have access to seven bases in the Latin American nation, says Bogota. The agreement, which has caused outrage among regional countries, was signed on Friday in Bogota by US Ambassador William Brownfield and Colombian Foreign Minister Jaime Bermudez, Reuters reported. Washington and Bogota claim that the defense deal is aimed at enhancing a joint war against narcoterrorism, and poses no threat whatsoever to the neighboring nations. "The pact is based on the principles of total respect for sovereign equality, territorial integrity and not intervening in the internal affairs of other states," said a statement issued by Colombia's foreign ministry. Latin American nations, especially the left-leaning Venezuela, are against the military presence of Washington in the region. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez earlier warned that the pact would unleash the "winds of war." Alex Jones has the "Empire on the Run" latest documentary Fall of the Republichttp://www.prisonplanet.com/fall-of-the-republic-millions-of-people-worldwide-take-the-red-pill.html
Fall Of The Republic: Millions Of People Worldwide Take The Red Pill
The revolution is being televised as blockbuster documentary explodes onto the Internet, unlocking minds and dismantling the elite’s conspiracy to exploit the financial crisis to finalize their global government takeover
Paul Joseph Watson Fall Of The Republic has exploded onto the Internet as millions of people worldwide take the red pill and discover the antidote to the establishment’s lies about what caused the financial collapse and their agenda to deceptively claim that empowering the very culprits of the crime will solve the problem, as America is frog-marched into a tyrannical system of world government. The consequence of The Obama Deception receiving tens of millions of views earlier this year manifested in the form of a key contribution to the burgeoning grass roots resistance that has dominated 2009, a nationwide movement against the big government agenda, as the globalists attempt to use their new front man Barack Hussein Obama to rapidly accelerate their new world order. Now we are calling on you, the Infowarrior, to help us make Fall Of The Republic go viral and in doing do dismantle the contrived perception that only by surrendering to nightmare levels of regulation and centralized control bossed by an ultra-powerful architecture of global governance will we avoid another great depression. Fall Of The Republic has the potential to outstrip even The Obama Deception in reaching millions more people, and early indications just over a week after the film was released are that this indeed happening. The You Tube version below already has over 300,000 views and this is just one of thousands of different versions that are floating around the web. Fall Of The Republic will be devastating for the globalists and their agenda to impose a new world economic order and the cap and trade scam, but only if you play your part in getting this information out to the world! The film is already unlocking minds on a massive scale and smashing the phony left-right paradigm. We have chosen to publicize and encourage circulation of the following version because it is encoded in the highest possible quality that You Tube allows and the full video is all in one place, rather than being broken up into different chunks. Please grab the following link and spread it to the four corners of the Internet. In allegorical terms, this simple URL represents a devastating virus that can infect the mainframe operating system of the new world order agenda – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU – Fall Of The Republic in full is embedded below.
This is a call to action – the battle plan for getting Fall Of The Republic out to as many people as possible comprises the following forms of activism. - Create your own video review of Fall Of The Republic and post it on You Tube, pointing people to where they can view the film for free. - Call into talk radio and tell people that they can watch Fall Of The Republic free on You Tube. - Get the DVD and make copies, hand them out in your local community. - Download the high quality DivX version at Prison Planet.tv and make CD copies that are playable on DVD players to hand out in your neighborhood. - Send the You Tube link out on your e mail list, post it on forums and bulletin boards across the web. - Hold DVD viewing parties and invite neighbors around to watch the film. Rent local cinema screens and broadcast the movie for free. Some would suggest undercutting our own operation in publicizing where people can watch Fall Of The Republic in its entirety for free. The entire project behind producing the film cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, but the information contained in the movie is so important to communicate and the times so perilous that we want as many people to see this documentary as possible, whether they pay for it or not – this is our main mission. However, we do need your support to allow us to continue to expose the globalists and this is why we ask that those who can afford it buy the DVD and make copies or subscribe to Prison Planet.tv where you can watch all Alex Jones’ movies in high quality as well as access daily archives of The Alex Jones Show. You can also watch live streaming video of The Alex Jones Show every day by becoming a member. (ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW) What People Are Saying About Fall Of The Republic “All I can say is “MY GOD!!!!!!!!!” Anyone who can’t see the raw piracy and fraud after watching this INCREDIBLE film, “Fall Of The Republic – By Alex Jones. Outstanding! One of his best documentaries by far!!! Beautifully mastered! Five Stars! *****” “Amazing work Alex. Such great thinkers brought together for our enlightenment. Thank you!!!” “Great movie. It is Alex Jones’s best movie yet. The production value is really high and we are seeing quality movie making again from non-fluoride drinking sentient talented beings. Bravo! I loved how Obama’s lies were exposed. It will make the sheep second guess Obaaaaaaama.” “Great Movie!!! Thanks Alex, I cross my fingers that it wakes more people up.” “Another AWESOME doc! Thanks A.J. AND CREW!” “A Megaton Bomb to the hydra-head of the New World Order!” “To put it bluntly, “THAT WAS f**kING BRILLIANT!” I don’t post often, but I’ve been a subscriber for several years now. THIS IS the film people should watch first. This film is easy to understand, presents clear facts (to which you should follow up on), and is edited/organized in a concise manner. It is definitely Jones’ best film to date. PLEASE make/buy copies and send it to everyone. I will be doing just that. I’ll say again that I think this is the film that people need to watch first. Then they can fill in the pieces with the other films and their own research.” “WOW…..Alex totally out done himself… YALL READY!!!!!” “Just finished watching it, this is by far the best Alex Jones film so far – a must watch.” “It’s great. The facts and info just keep coming at you like machine gun fire. It lays it all out in as clear a fashion as you could want. Sure to wake up many, many people still locked into the controlled Democrat = Good – Republican = Bad/Republican = Good – Democrat = Bad mainstream news media illusion. Anyone watching this and paying any attention at all will come away with the indisputable knowledge of who is really running things, and what their plans really are. And just in case you’re reading this thread, keep making these films Alex. They will keep on waking up more and more people as time goes on. The trend of people finding out the truth due to films like this is not going to subside, but will just continue on until the “sleeping giant” awakens from it’s deep slumber. the mainstream news media will do it’s best to lull it back to sleep, but it ain’t happening.” “Like taking a year of advanced US & World history in a few hours. The info war is working!” Watch You Tube users’ reviews of Fall Of The Republic below.
Prison Planet.tv Members Can Watch Fall Of The Republic Right Now Online - Don't The Politics of Heroin Smuggling, and Those That Get Caught...DEA Denies Wrong-DoingPosted by Bill Conroy - October 19, 2009 at 10:39 pm
Agents — Two Since Retired, One Now Leading High-powered Task Force — Call Claims “Absurd” and “Despicable” A top gun with the DEA’s Special Operations Division, along with two fellow law enforcers, are not what they seem, if Gaetano (Guy) DiGirolamo Sr., a convicted heroin dealer, is to be believed. The trio are, in fact, drug dealers themselves, argues Yale law professor Steven B. Duke in court pleadings filed on behalf of his client, DiGirolamo.
However, documents recently provided to Narco News by DiGirolamo (uncovered years after his conviction), as well as revelations that have surfaced recently in the case of national security whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, seem to open the door to reasonable doubt in the government’s case against DiGirolamo. As for the three DEA agents involved in his case, they have long maintained that DiGirolamo’s allegations against them are without merit. One of those agents, Derek Maltz, now serves as the special agent in charge of the high-powered and secretive Special Operations Division, a multi-agency task force under DEA’s umbrella that targets transnational criminal organizations. The other two agents who helped send DiGirolamo up the river, David Katz and Michael Yanniello, have both since retired from DEA. Yanniello now serves as chief of university police for SUNY College at Old Westbury in New York. Katz is the CEO and founder of a security consulting firm called Global Security Group, based in New York City. Yanniello, when contacted via e-mail by Narco News for comment, replied simply that DiGirolamo’s “allegations are absurd.” Katz, in a telephone interview with Narco News, says DiGirolamo’s claims are “beyond absurd,” describing them as “despicable.” DiGirolamo tried to “solicit” a contract “to have me murdered,” Katz alleged during a phone interview with Narco News, adding that there is a transcript of the surveillance tape on which that threat is made. Well, that is where the facts in the DiGirolamo case begin to get a bit slippery, if the court pleadings filed by Duke are put in the picture. The alleged murder plot surfaced on the word of a jailhouse informant sicced on DiGirolamo while he was in prison, according to court pleadings. In a 1998 letter written to the judge in the case, attorney Duke points out that the U.S. prosecutor claimed to have the “murder plot on tape,” adding that the allegation “was either a lie or a recklessly irresponsible misrepresentation.” “We have the tape (obtained under FOIA),” Duke wrote “There is nothing remotely related to violence or retribution on it.” Smacked up DiGirolamo’s run-in with the system — the DEA specifically — led to his indictment in 1991 and conviction in 1994 on heroin-related conspiracy charges in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. DiGirolamo appealed his conviction, only to lose again in 1995. At that point, Duke, a professor of law at Yale Law School in New Haven, Conn., stepped in, and took on DiGirolamo’s case pro bono. In 1997, Duke filed a post-conviction petition [a habeas corpus appeal] with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York seeking to vacate DiGirolamo’s conviction. “In December 1999, (the federal judge) dismissed the entire case in one of the most bizarre opinions I have ever seen,” Duke says. “... Essentially, (the judge) said it didn’t matter if the DEA agents were corrupt smugglers.” DiGirolamo appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Last year, the appeals court ruled against DiGirolamo, not on the merits, but because he “did not file a timely notice of appeal.” As a result, the appeals court concluded, “we lack jurisdiction to consider the denial of his habeas petition.” But it is the merits of DiGirolamo’s case that continue to keep bubbling to the surface, even after all these years. In particular, new documents provided to Narco News by DiGirolamo seem to raise some puzzling questions with respect to the nature of the sting used by the three DEA agents (Maltz, Katz and Yanniello) to snare their targets. One of those documents is a DEA Telex communication that details a proposed itinerary for DEA agent Maltz to travel from New York to Pakistan to take delivery of 20 kilos (some 44 pounds) of heroin from DEA’s office in Karachi. Maltz made that journey in late November 1990 and returned with the heroin on Dec. 4, 1990. During the return trip, according to court pleadings filed by Duke, Maltz flew on commercial airliners (TWA and Air France) and made one stop in Paris before returning to New York with the heroin. The heroin run was allegedly part of a controlled delivery, which is a standard law enforcement procedure that involves allowing a load of drugs, under close supervision, to be delivered to suspects in order to set them up for arrest. In this case, because the heroin was passing through at least two foreign countries, DEA would have had to obtained clearances from those countries — Pakistan and France. In addition, law enforcers tell Narco News, in a normal controlled delivery, the “take down” (or arrest) of the suspects is usually accomplished very shortly after the drugs enter the U.S.. “We never let it [the drugs] out of our sight [in a controlled delivery] and took down the bad guys within hours of the stuff arriving,” one law enforcer says. In the case of Maltz’ heroin run to Pakistan, he was not acting in an undercover capacity, according to Duke’s court pleadings, but rather as a courier seemingly absent close surveillance of his activities. In addition, Duke alleges in the court filings that Maltz never produced proof that his heroin “controlled delivery” mission involving Pakistan had the proper approvals, including the required country approvals. The DEA Telex document obtained by Narco News (see document here) is interesting in that is seemingly shows that Maltz was approved to travel to Pakistan on Nov. 25, 1990, with a connecting flight in Frankfurt, Germany. The return flight, according to the Telex, also was supposed to go through Frankfurt as well — with the appropriate country clearance slated to be obtained form the German government for the transportation of the heroin through that nation. However, in a follow-up communication on Nov. 27, 1990, the document shows, the fly-out date for Maltz trip to Pakistan was changed to Nov. 29. In addition, in a separate document, a DEA report of investigation prepared by a Karachi-based DEA agent, a notation appears indicating that the Pakistan Narcotics Control Board on Nov. 26, 1990, approved the “exportation of 20 kilograms of heroin from Karachi, Pakistan, to New York,” but it makes no mention of a similar approval from the government of France, where Maltz allegedly flew next after leaving Karachi with the heroin, according to court pleadings in the DiGirolamo case. One law enforcer who examined the paperwork for Narco News says “the Telex's are legitimate to me, just incomplete as far as I can see, or just plain sloppy, or missing stuff on purpose.” Duke appears to believe the latter scenario is the case. In 1998, he wrote a letter to the judge in DiGirolamo’s case: Previously suppressed DEA reports, obtained by us ... describe three months of feverish activity in the New York area trying to deliver the heroin to … "distributors." Despite many claimed conversations with … with CIs [confidential informants] and with … alleged distributors, no deliveries are consummated, just a lot of talk. According to the DEA agents in this case, the 12 kilos of white heroin [out of a total of 20 kilos] brought by agent Maltz from Pakistan in December 1990 were finally delivered to [DiGirolamo’s] co-defendant [Louis] Salerno and became evidence in this case with his arrest on April 9, 1991. Then, in court pleadings, Duke points out that it took months for the heroin imported by Maltz from Pakistan to be put to use in “taking down” suspects — as opposed to hours as is normally the case, according to law enforcement sources, in a standard controlled delivery: ... Nobody can be found to take delivery of any drugs [brought in from Pakistan by Maltz] until five months after their arrival. Duke argues, in the 1998 letter to the judge: The agents were engaging in their own smuggling operation, for the purpose of selling the drugs and using "stings" as a cover for their operation. ... Maltz concocted a "plan" to get a drug supply in Pakistan without paying for the drugs, bring them here for illicit purposes, and cover his tracks with phony paperwork. ... DiGirolamo was accused of acting in conspiracy with Salerno to take possession of the heroin, all based on the word of an informant, court records show. And the one undercover tape-recording in which DiGirolamo is supposedly caught discussing the conspiracy is mysteriously inaudible, Duke claims in court pleadings. DiGirolamo, in recent e-mail and phone interviews with Narco News from prison, contends he had nothing to do with that heroin deal. The other co-conspirator in the case, an individual named Khan, according to DEA agents, was arrested in the United Arab Emirates UAI) and imprisoned, awaiting a death sentence. However, DiGirolamo's attorney obtained a letter from the UAE embassy indicating they "have no record of Mr. Khan being imprisoned in the country." The private investigator on DiGirolamo’s case, a former cop who worked pro bono due to his belief in DiGirolamo’s innocence, also dug up evidence that the now-vanished Khan served as an informant for the U.S. government in a prior case and suggests that he is not a co-conspirator, but rather that Kahn continued to work for the government as an informant in DiGirolamo's case — which, if true, would appear to make the case against DiGirolamo a fraud. Where’s the Dope? The supposed kingpin of the Pakistani heroin organization being targeted by Maltz, Katz and Yanniello was an individual named Jan, according to the DEA. However, according to Duke’s court pleadings, Jan claims that he was working for the DEA, supplying heroin for delivery to the U.S. "with the expectation that the buyers would be arrested and he would get a reward.” Duke also argues in court pleadings that there is no evidence to show that Khan even knew Jan or did business with him. So, Duke asks, how could DiGirolamo be part of the Jan organization if his supposed co-conspirator, Khan, never did business with the supposed source of the heroin, Jan? The government, by contrast, denies that Jan or Khan ever worked as informants and contends the balance of the allegations raised by Duke on behalf of DiGirolamo are absurd and untrue. From the government’s pleadings in DiGirolamo’s post-conviction appeal case: DiGirolamo … argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because he 1) failed to claim that Hizbullah Khan was an informant and 2) failed to claim that there was no Jan organization, and that Special Agent Maltz was using the pretense of investigating the supposed Jan organization to mask the agents’ narcotics trafficking. As set forth above, neither claim has merit. Accordingly, the failure to raise either claim could not have been error. However, yet another set of documents provided to Narco News by DiGirolamo appears to raise a whole new series of questions with respect to the veracity of the case that the DEA agents brought against him. From Duke's pleadings: ... On April 2, 1991, Malik [a DEA informant] met Louis Salerno at a diner on Long Island. Malik told Salerno he had 12 kilograms of ninety percent pure white heroin, and he was willing to turn it over to Salerno for $100,000. Malik's courier charge for transporting it from Pakistan. Salerno asked for a sample so he could test it. ... On April 8, 1991, Malik met Salerno. Salerno said that the sample was "fine" and that he would have the $100,000 courier fee the following day. After a series of telephone calls the following day, Salerno and Malik met again in the parking lot of a Holiday Inn at the Plainview Plaza. Salerno gave Malik a bag containing $100,000. Malik took the money inside the hotel while Salerno remained in the parking lot. After giving the money to DEA agents, Malik went back to the parking lot and told Salerno that Malik's friend would arrive in five minutes with the heroin. Shortly thereafter, DEA agent Michael Yanniello drove into the parking lot and put the heroin in the trunk of Salerno's car. Malik told Salerno that everything was done and asked Salerno to call him to "discuss the rest." Malik walked away, and DEA agents arrested Salerno. But years later, DiGirolamo’s lawyer, Duke, discovered that the heroin put in the trunk that day may not have been heroin at all. From another 1998 letter Duke directed to the judge in DiGirolamo's case: At petitioner's trial, the DEA agents testified that 20 kilos of heroin were brought by agent Maltz from Pakistan in December 1990, and that 12 kilos of that shipment were ultimately delivered in a sting operation to co-defendant Salerno in April 1991. No drugs were ever produced at trial. Instead, a photograph was offered together with a stipulation. The stipulation had never been approved by either of the defendants, even though it had a place for their signature, which remained blank. ... FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] documents recently obtained show that the packages turned over to the DEA lab by agents Maltz and Yanniello were never even tested for heroin. According to the lab documents, these items were to be weighed and identified only, per agent Yanniello and per agent Maltz. The work sheets suggest that while some rough screening tests may have been done, no actual determinations were made that the powders were heroin, much less that they contained the purities set forth by AUSA [Assistant U.S. Attorney] Burns in the stipulation. [See lab report here.] On yet another front, Duke says a witness has come forward who claims to have purchased heroin from individuals fitting the description of the DEA agents in the DiGirolamo case. The witness, Louis Perez, a former cop who is serving a life sentence in a federal prison on drug conspiracy charges, claims the heroin he and his one-time partner, Jesus Vargas Morales, acquired in those deals in Queens, N.Y. (some 40 ounces a week at $6,000 an ounce) were in turn sold on the streets of Philadelphia. [See Perez affidavit here.] The government discounts the Perez’ claims, arguing he disgraced his badge and is a convict whose word is not credible. However, Duke contends he has made numerous requests of government prosecutors for various records, including phone numbers, that would help substantiate or disprove the claims being made by Perez, but “all those requests have been ignored.” Former DEA agent Katz says he finds incredulous the claims that DiGirolamo is an innocent man who was somehow framed. He spelled out his position in a phone interview with Narco News: The reason he [DiGirolamo] keeps losing on appeal is he did it [the crime]. … I would be happy to testify under oath to any element of the case. I remember monitoring the undercover calls. He did it. There was nothing inappropriate done in the case. It was basic undercover case and he was completely complicit in the whole crime. … [DEA agents] Maltz and Yanniello are two of the best agents I ever worked with. They are honest guys, and any suggestion that they were involved in heroin trafficking is beyond absurd. These guys were as opposite that as you can imagine. For people to suggest otherwise is despicable. DiGirolamo, now 77, concedes he has done wrong in the past and has paid the price. He spent much of the 1980s (1984-1990) in federal prison after being convicted of distributing some 164 grams of cocaine over a two-year period. He was out of prison about a year when he was indicted on the heroin-related charges. DiGirolamo says he “deserved to go away” on the cocaine charges, but insists he is innocent of the heroin-related charges and is now sitting in prison “for the crimes of others.” In an e-mail to Narco News, DiGirolamo describes his dilemma: Because of my background is associations with assumed O.C. [organized crime] friends, the government is using that card to distort the truth. I expected this to happen and I know that many nights I lay awake in my cell looking at the ceiling wishing that I would have went down a different road. I do not want to play the pity card, because that is not me. I am above all else a man of honor, and I do not mean the honor the government would have you believe. When injustice is the only means by which the government uses to convict a person, then we as a nation have failed. Pakistan Connection DiGirolamo’s claim that he has been framed may seem, to some, like a predictable act of desperation on the part of a man who is now confronting the prospect of his death in prison. That may or may not be so. But one thing is clear: the strangeness of the truth DiGirolamo wants us to believe does not automatically make it fiction. Likewise, the dark reality of the heroin trade itself is no less true simply because those accused of dabbling in it are not deemed the usual suspects — as evidenced by the allegations of former-FBI-translator-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds. Edmonds was born in Iran but spent much of her early life in Turkey before moving to the United States for college. After graduating, she wound up working in the criminal justice field and was eventually hired by the FBI in 2001 as a contract translator. Edmonds’ walk down the path of the American dream came to an abrupt end in March 2002, though, when she was fired by the FBI — after blowing the whistle on alleged espionage being carried out by a fellow FBI employee. She was prevented from pursuing a whistleblower retaliation lawsuit filed in 2002 (based on alleged violations of her First Amendment rights) because of the state-secrets privilege claim invoked by the government. That claim essentially shut down her ability to present evidence in the case under the smokescreen that it would threaten national security. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately rejected her appeal in that case. Several related lawsuits filed by Edmonds also were subsequently derailed with the hammer of national security. But Edmonds was not about to be silenced, and recently came forward — both through court testimony and via the media — with revelations concerning matters the U.S. government has for years now sought to secret away in the closet of dirty tricks. According to Edmonds, roughly within the same time period of DiGirolamo’s indictment and ultimate conviction (the 1990s), U.S. officials based in Central Asia, specifically Turkey, were involved in a pattern of alleged corruption that included links to heroin trafficking. It is not clear whether that alleged activity represented only corruption for personal gain or was part of a larger covert operation to advance U.S. interests in the region — including Pakistan, where DEA agent Maltz allegedly obtained the 20 kilos of heroin brought to New York. It may, in fact, have been a bit of both. As described in Edmonds allegations, the corrupt activity brought together drug traffickers, assassins and individuals associated with the governments of the U.S., Israel, Pakistan and Turkey toward various ends — including blackmailing or otherwise influencing members of the U.S. Congress; obtaining and reselling U.S. military secrets; and engaging in arms-for-drugs shipments, specifically heroin, to help fund covert activities in Central Asia. From an interview Edmonds provided to the American Conservative magazine: EDMONDS: … A lot of the drugs were going to Belgium with NATO planes. After that, they went to the UK, and a lot came to the U.S. via military planes to distribution centers in Chicago and Paterson, New Jersey. … In under-oath testimony (link here) Edmonds provided recently in a case before the Ohio Elections Commission, she lays out the central role that Turkey played in the drug-smuggling operations: … These Turkish people, and some of them are directly connected to Turkish intelligence and Turkish military in the United Sates, they played a very significant role in bringing in heroin from … Afghanistan to Turkey, [and] from Turkey into both United States, [and] also directly to Belgium, large quantity, very, very large quantity of heroin. In a recent interview with Narco News, Edmonds pointed to an incident that occurred in New York City in 1995, one year after DiGirolamo’s conviction on heroin charges. The incident involved the arrest of Yasar Oz — a known Turkish heroin trafficker who is suspected of working as an asset for both Turkish and U.S. intelligence agencies. A DEA agent (name unknown) arrested Oz, Edmonds says, in New York City on Dec. 6, 1995, with some 12 kilos of heroin — and while he was supposedly carrying Turkish diplomatic papers. Edmonds' recounting of the incident is backed up in a 1997 story in CovertAction Quarterly, a respected publication on such matters: The special perks and privileges given Catli, a drug dealer and suspected killer, were not unique. Haluk Kirci, his accomplice in a series of murders during the Gray Wolves days, and Yasar Oz, another international drug smuggler, also carried similar [Turkish Green Passport] documents signed by Agar. … The links between one of Turkey's most prominent security officials and organized criminals and fascist assassins were now incontrovertible. … [Turkey’s Republican People's Party Deputy Fikri] Saglar charges that US interest in Turkish affairs is not confined to official NATO relations and trade ties. He points to the notorious message by the CIA's then-Turkey Station Chief Paul Henze in Ankara to his colleagues in Washington the day after the 1980 coup — "Our boys have done it!" Henze crowed. Saglar concludes that foreign intelligence organizations, including the CIA, have co-opted collaborators from among the extreme-right and exploited them for their particular interests. Saglar's charge is lent credence by the fact that Yasar Oz — one of the drug traffickers carrying the Green Passports signed by [Turkey’s Interior Minister] Mehmet Agar — was arrested by the Drug Enforcement Administration in New York and immediately released. Oz supposedly "escaped" DEA custody 6 hours after his arrest in 1995 and flew out of JFK International Airport on a Turkish airline, Edmonds claims. He's still alive and kicking in Turkey – the owner of a casino who is now doing jail time and beginning to reveal secrets, news reports indicate. Edmonds also points to the research of University of Wisconsin Professor Alfred McCoy, referencing an entry on her blog, 123 Real Change, that touches on his research into the heroin trade in Pakistan. From Edmonds blog: In his well-researched book, The Politics of Heroin, Professor Alfred McCoy documents the parallel increase in Heroin production in Afghanistan and Pakistan during the 1980s when the U.S. Government collaborated and supported the Mujahidin directly and indirectly. While in 1979 Pakistan had a small and local opium trade and produced no heroin, by 1981, according to U.S. Attorney General William French Smith, Pakistan emerged as the world's leading supplier of heroin, became the supplier of nearly 60% of U.S. heroin supply, and took over major sections of the market in Europe. [McCoy writes:] “Who were the manufacturers? They were all either military factions connected with Pakistan intelligence, CIA allies, or Afghan resistance groups connected with the CIA and Pakistan intelligence. In May of 1990, ten years after this began, the Washington Post finally ran a front page story saying high U.S. officials admit that Gulbuddin Hekmatyar [leader of the Hezbi-i Islami guerilla group], and other leaders of the Afghan resistance are leading heroin manufacturers. This had been known for years, reported in the Pakistan press, indeed in 1980 reported in McClean's magazine. In fact in 1980 a White House narcotics advisor, Dr. David Musto of Yale University, went on the record demanding that we not ally with Afghan guerilla groups that were involved in narcotics.” McCoy also documents interesting phenomena involving the DEA operations and actions (or inaction) in Afghanistan during the 80s: [McCoy writes:] “During the 1980's from the time that heroin trade started, there were 17 DEA agents based in Pakistan. They neither made nor participated in any major seizures or arrests. At a time when other police forces, particularly Scandinavian forces, made some major seizures and brought down a very major syndicate connected with former president Zia ul-Haq of Pakistan.” Narco News was not able to confirm any connection between Katz, Maltz or Yanneilo and the catch-and-releases arrest of Oz. However, Maltz, as special agent in charge of DEA’s Special Operations Division (SOD), clearly has a foot in the intelligence world. One DEA agent who spoke with Narco News says part of what the SOD does is overt, but part of it also is classified — to the point where the agent could not even discuss the nature of that classified work. Narco News attempted to contact Maltz for this story through DEA’s public affairs office. However, neither the DEA nor Maltz provided a comment for this story prior to deadline. Former DEA agent Katz also has an interesting resume, serving prior to his retirement from the agency as its liaison to the Israeli Secret Service. Katz even provided training in 2000 to instructors with the Israeli General Security Agency (Shin Bet, now called the Israel Security Agency) — considered to be part of the Israeli intelligence apparatus. According to information on his company’s Web site, Global Security Group currently employs former “U.S. and Israeli agents” and has “trained the EXP staffs of some of the world's most high-profile executives and high-net worth individuals.” Katz even wrote a book with a former Israeli secret service officer, called the “Executive's Guide to Personal Security,” and has made appearances on numerous TV news shows, including Fox, CNN and CNBC. Katz' Global Security Group also recently opened an office in Thailand that is headed by a “former senior supervisory special agent” with DEA "who spend 20 years working in Thailand with senior officials within the Thai law enforcement community," according to the company’s Web site. However, Katz dismisses any implication that his work on DiGirolamo’s case in the early 1990s had anything to do with the intelligence world. “The DEA liaison role [with Israel’s Secret Service] was to provide basic law enforcement support and mutual training [with respect to tactics]. I was in that role long after the DiGirolamo case, like late 1990s or 2000,” Katz told Narco News. With respect to any possible intelligence connection to DiGirolamo’s case, Katz added: “Your talking way above my pay grade. I was just a regular field agent and tactical weapons instructor.” As for DiGirolamo, he is not backing down from his contention that he was set up to take the fall for actors more powerful that himself. But DiGirolamo also realizes he is facing the ultimate deadline for making known what he deems to be the truth of is life: My life is coming to a close. I turned 77 and I know that the clock is running out on me. My only wish is that I want to expose the corruption that permeated this case and has cost me 19 years of my life. To them, it is just the cost of doing business. I do not expect miracles. I know what I am up against, but time is not on my side; it is on the side of the government. They would like nothing better than for me to pass on and not have to worry about me uncovering Clunkers: Taxpayers paid $24,000 per (junk) carClunkers: Taxpayers paid $24,000 per carAuto sales analysts at Edmunds.com say the pricey program resulted in relatively few additional car sales.NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- A total of 690,000 new vehicles were sold under the Cash for Clunkers program last summer, but only 125,000 of those were vehicles that would not have been sold anyway, according to an analysis released Wednesday by the automotive Web site Edmunds.com. Still, auto sales contributed heavily to the economy's expansion in the third quarter, adding 1.7 percentage points to the nation's gross domestic product growth. The Cash for Clunkers program gave car buyers rebates of up to $4,500 if they traded in less fuel-efficient vehicles for new vehicles that met certain fuel economy requirements. A total of $3 billion was allotted for those rebates. The average rebate was $4,000. But the overwhelming majority of sales would have taken place anyway at some time in the last half of 2009, according to Edmunds.com. That means the government ended up spending about $24,000 each for those 125,000 additional vehicle sales. "It is unfortunate that Edmunds.com has had nothing but negative things to say about a wildly successful program that sold nearly 250,000 cars in its first four days alone," said Bill Adams, spokesman for the Department of Transportation. "There can be no doubt that CARS drummed up more business for car dealers at a time when they needed help the most." In order to determine whether these sales would have happened anyway, Edmunds.com analysts looked at sales of luxury cars and other vehicles not included under the Clunkers program. Using traditional relationships between sales volumes of those vehicles and the types of vehicles sold under Cash for Clunkers, Edmunds.com projected what sales would normally have been during the Cash for Clunkers period and in the weeks after. Edmunds.com's estimate of the ultimate sales increase generally matches what industry experts had thought, said George Pipas, a sales analyst with Ford Motor Co (F, Fortune 500). But that misses the point, he said. "The whole purpose of the program was to provide some kind of catalyst to kick-start the economy," he said, "and by all accounts the extra production that was added this year was a boost to the economy." Ford was one of the biggest proponents of the Cash for Clunkers program and several Ford models were among the top sellers under the program. While auto sales in September were hurt because auto dealership inventories were drained of products by the program, sales this month are already back on track or better, Pipas said. "I think the October sales results will show Clunkers is behind us and there's no more payback or inventories issues." Emunds.com's projection indicates that, without Cash for Clunkers, October's sales increase would be even higher. Loosening of F.B.I. Rules Stirs Privacy ConcernsNTM Staff Note:
Can the FBI keep the Dept. of Homeland Security in-check, or vice versa?
Loosening of F.B.I. Rules Stirs Privacy Concerns
Thursday, October 29, 2009
By CHARLIE SAVAGE, The New York Times
WASHINGTON -- After a Somali-American teenager from Minneapolis committed a suicide bombing in Africa in October 2008, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating whether a Somali Islamist group had recruited him on United States soil. Instead of collecting information only on people about whom they had a tip or links to the teenager, agents fanned out to scrutinize Somali communities, including Seattle and Columbus, Ohio. The operation unfolded as the Bush administration was in the midst of relaxing some domestic intelligence-gathering rules. The F.B.I.'s interpretation of those rules was recently made public when it released, in response to a Freedom of Information lawsuit, its "Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide." The disclosure of the manual has opened the widest window yet onto how agents have been given greater power in the post-Sept. 11 era. In seeking the revised rules, the bureau said it needed greater flexibility to hunt for would-be terrorists inside the United States. But the manual's details have alarmed privacy advocates. One section lays out a low threshold to start investigating a person or group as a potential security threat. Another allows agents to use ethnicity or religion as a factor -- as long as it is not the only one -- when selecting subjects for scrutiny. "It raises fundamental questions about whether a domestic intelligence agency can protect civil liberties if they feel they have a right to collect broad personal information about people they don't even suspect of wrongdoing," said Mike German, a former F.B.I. agent who now works for the American Civil Liberties Union. But Valerie Caproni, the F.B.I.'s general counsel, said the bureau has adequate safeguards to protect civil liberties as it looks for people who could pose a threat. "Those who say the F.B.I. should not collect information on a person or group unless there is a specific reason to suspect that the target is up to no good seriously miss the mark," Ms. Caproni said. "The F.B.I. has been told that we need to determine who poses a threat to the national security -- not simply to investigate persons who have come onto our radar screen." The manual authorizes agents to open an "assessment" to "proactively" seek information about whether people or organizations are involved in national security threats. Agents may begin such assessments against a target without a particular factual justification. The basis for such an inquiry "cannot be arbitrary or groundless speculation," the manual says, but the standard is "difficult to define." Assessments permit agents to use potentially intrusive techniques, like sending confidential informants to infiltrate organizations and following and photographing targets in public. F.B.I. agents previously had similar powers when looking for potential criminal activity. But until the recent changes, greater justification was required to use the powers in national security investigations because they receive less judicial oversight. If agents turn up something specific to suggest wrongdoing, they can begin a "preliminary" or "full" investigation and use additional techniques, like wiretapping. But even if agents find nothing, the personal information they collect during assessments can be retained in F.B.I. databases, the manual says. When selecting targets, agents are permitted to consider political speech or religion as one criterion. The manual tells agents not to engage in racial profiling, but it authorizes them to take into account "specific and relevant ethnic behavior" and to "identify locations of concentrated ethnic communities." Farhana Khera, president of Muslim Advocates, said the F.B.I. was harassing Muslim-Americans by singling them out for scrutiny. Her group was among those that sued the bureau. to release the manual. "We have seen even in recent months the revelation of the F.B.I. going into mosques -- not where they have a specific reason to believe there is criminal activity, but as 'agent provocateurs' who are trying to incite young individuals to join a purported terror plot," Ms. Khera said. "We think the F.B.I. should be focused on following actual leads rather than putting entire communities under the microscope." Ms. Caproni, the F.B.I. lawyer, denied that the bureau engages in racial profiling. She cited the search for signs of the Somali group, Al Shabaab, linked to the Minneapolis teenager to illustrate why the manual allows agents to consider ethnicity when deciding where to look. In that case, the bureau worried that other such teenagers might return from Somalia to carry out domestic operations. Agents are trained to ignore ethnicity when looking for groups that have no ethnic tie, like environmental extremists, she said, but "if you are looking for Al Shabaab, you are looking for Somalis." Among the manual's safeguards, agents must use the "least intrusive investigative method that effectively accomplishes the operational objective." When infiltrating an organization, agents cannot sabotage its "legitimate social or political agenda," nor lead it "into criminal activity that otherwise probably would not have occurred." Portions of the manual were redacted, including pages about "undisclosed participation" in an organization's activities by agents or informants, "requesting information without revealing F.B.I. affiliation or the true purpose of a request," and using "ethnic/racial demographics." The attorney general guidelines for F.B.I. operations date back to 1976, when a Congressional investigation by the so-called Church Committee uncovered decades of illegal domestic spying by the bureau on groups perceived to be subversive -- including civil rights, women's rights and antiwar groups -- under the bureau's longtime former director, J. Edgar Hoover, who died in 1972. The Church Committee proposed that rules for the F.B.I.'s domestic security investigations be written into federal law. To forestall legislation, the attorney general in the Ford administration, Edward Levi, issued his own guidelines that established such limits internally. Since then, administrations of both parties have repeatedly adjusted the guidelines. In September 2008, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey signed the new F.B.I. guidelines that expanded changes begun under his predecessor, John Ashcroft, after the Sept. 11 attacks. The guidelines went into effect and the F.B.I. completed the manual putting them into place last December. There are no signs that the current attorney general, Eric H. Holder Jr., plans to roll back the changes. A spokeswoman said Mr. Holder was monitoring them "to see how well they work" and would make refinements if necessary. The F.B.I., however, is revising the manual. Ms. Caproni said she was taking part in weekly high-level meetings to evaluate suggestions from agents and expects about 20 changes. Many proposals have been requests for greater flexibility. For example, some agents said requirements that they record in F.B.I. computers every assessment, no matter how minor, were too time consuming. But Ms. Caproni said the rule aided oversight and would not be changed. She also said that the F.B.I. takes seriously its duty to protect freedom while preventing terrorist attacks. "I don't like to think of us as a spy agency because that makes me really nervous," she said. "We don't want to live in an environment where people in the United States think the government is spying on them. That's an oppressive environment to live in and we don't want to live that way." What the public should understand, she continued, is that the F.B.I. is seeking to become a more intelligence-driven agency that can figure out how best to deploy its agents to get ahead of potential threats. "And to do that," she said, "you need information." This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09302/1009222-84.stm?cmpid=news.xml#ixzz0VR2Iuo6i Margaret Thatcher's advisor: Global Warming "hype" a pretext to World GovernmentCLIMATE CHANGE TREATY A PRECURSOR TO GLOBAL GOVERNMENT http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin543.htm By Chuck Baldwin Writing for WorldNetDaily, Dr. Jerome Corsi states, "A former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher says the real purpose of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on Dec. 7-18 is to use global warming hype as a pretext to lay the foundation for a one-world government." Corsi quotes Lord Christopher Monckton as telling a Minnesota Free Market Institute audience at Bethel University in St. Paul, "Your president will sign it. Most of the Third World countries will sign it, because they think they're going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regimes from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won't sign it." Corsi quotes Monckton as also saying, "I read that treaty and what it says is this: that a world government is going to be created. The word 'government' actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity." See Corsi's column here. To see a YouTube video segment of Lord Monckton's address click here. Plus, here is a later Fox Business interview with Lord Monckton, in which he further expands his thoughts. Did Lord Monckton exaggerate? My research of the Climate Change document that Monckton references found the following: it is a 181-page working document that does not mention the words "ballot," "elected official," or "vote" anywhere in it. In my opinion, Lord Monckton did not exaggerate; if anything, he may have understated the situation. The document does indeed appear to be the institutional framework for an unelected supreme communist-style world government. By signing this document, the United States (and other industrial nations) will forever take responsibility for the ills of backwards and third world countries. And, according to Lord Monckton, this would include China and India, along with the countries of Africa. Notice: Page 6, "PP.15 Further acknowledging that developed countries have a historical responsibility for their disproportionate contribution to the causes and consequences of climate change, reflecting their disproportionate historical use of a shared global carbon space since 1850 as well as their proposed continuing disproportional use of the remaining global carbon space . . . Warming of the climate system, as a consequence of human activity, is unequivocal." Page 38, "28. The adverse effects of climate change and response measures, due to the historical cumulative GHG emissions of developed countries, constitute an additional burden on all developing country Parties (particularly low-lying and other small island countries, countries with low-lying coastal, arid and semi-arid areas or areas liable to floods, drought and desertification, and developing countries with fragile mountainous ecosystems) in reducing poverty, developing strategies to address social vulnerabilities and attaining sustainable development and a threat to achieving the United Nations Millennium Development Goals." Page 122, "17. (a) Compensate for damage to the LDC's economy and also compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity . . ." "(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably compensated for environmental, social and economic losses . . ." By signing and being party to this document, we are accepting legal financial responsibility to support non-developed countries FOREVER. Page 27, "(b) Particularly vulnerable populations, groups and communities, [or] All vulnerable groups whose adaptive capacity is low, [or] Groups requiring special protection . . ." Page 43, "41. (a) Assessed contributions of at least 0.7% of annual GDP of developed country Parties." These funds will go directly to governments and "community organizations." Page 39, "33. [The financial burden] must be at least USD 67 billion (in the range of USD 70-140 billion) per year." The commitments of the developed countries are "economy wide." Page 58, "7. (a) Mitigation commitments by all developed countries are legally binding economy wide and absolute quantified emission reduction commitments." "(b) Mitigation actions by developing countries are VOLUNTARY . . ." (Emphasis added.) The system appears to be loaded to ensure that the world body overseeing this document is granted total control for the enforcement of the requirements of this document throughout all developed countries. Penalties for non-compliance by developed countries are scattered throughout the document. It appears that what a U.S. President and Congress (Republican or Democratic) could not do through the constitutional legislative process, they are attempting to do through international treaty. Therefore, it is my studied opinion that Lord Monckton's assessment that this upcoming Climate Change Convention in Copenhagen is a "pretext" for the establishment of one world government is "spot-on." It does seem to be getting clearer and clearer that if the elected civil magistrates in Washington, D.C., do not quickly grow some backbone and develop some sagacity as to the direction these globalists are taking our country, resistance will be forced (in one way or another) upon the States and the People, because it is not possible for the policies and financial burden that are--and will be--levied upon the backs of the American people to be sustained without the surrender of independence, the abridgment of constitutional government, and the loss of liberty. Stay tuned. *If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link. © 2009 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved |
|
|